The Gospel

Friday, September 30, 2011

Whatever happened to powerful preaching - Todd McCauley








I LOVE preaching, I am a preacher, I listen to a lot of preaching.  I mean, I literally listen to hours of sermons via Mp3, and internet streaming. So much, thankfully so, is available today.  Some of the preaching I hear is good and some of it is downright bad, by bad I don’t necessarily mean doctrinally incorrect, rather its boring, dry, impotent and ineffectual. The thing that I ponder as I listen is, “you know”, there is no lack of “entertaining” preaching, no lack of “informative” preaching, there’s lots of supposed “Relevant” preaching.  BUT! What’s missing in my opinion is “POWERFUL” preaching”.  The internet dictionary defines powerful as:

1. Having great power or force or potency or effect.
2. Strong enough to knock down or overwhelm.
3. Having great influence.

What makes preaching powerful?  In other words, what gives preaching potency and effect?  What factors make preaching strong enough to knock down or overwhelm?  What causes preaching to have great influence?  Is it the style of the preacher?  Is it the content of the preaching?  Is it the personality or antics of the preacher?  I’ve been reading through one of my favorite books of the New Testament, the books of Acts.  I like the book of Acts because it gives us an inspired history of the way the church used to be, warts and all. Unfortunately, the modern church in my opinion pales in comparison.  As I have been slowly working through Acts, I’ve observed some examples of “powerful” preaching.  Again, what's meant By powerful is, that which is "potent, effectual, overwhelming, influential".  For example, Peter’s sermon in Acts 2 ends with his audience being, “pierced to the heart” (2:37).  The word for pierced is the word: Katanussomai, meaning “to pierce through with compunction and pain of heart”. The word compunction means, “anxiety arising from awareness of guilt”.  Peter’s preaching caused the people in his audience to experience deep anxiety and guilt to the point that all they could say is, “Brethren, what shall we do?  Peter’s second sermon in Acts 3 ended with Peter and John being arrested and thrown into jail (4:1-3). The reason for their imprisonment was because their powerful preaching caused their listeners great vexation. In other words, they were greatly annoyed and irritated with what they were hearing so much so that they were compelled to do away with the source of their vexation.  As I reflected on Peter’s preaching, as well as the others who preached throughout Acts, I began asking myself, “What made their preaching so powerful”?  I’ve discovered several principles that characterized the powerful preaching of Peter and the early Christian community:     
 

Principle Number One:
It was Christ centered preaching

22 "Men of Israel, listen to these words : JESUS THE NAZARENE, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know - 23 this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. 24 "But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power. 25 "For David says of Him, 'I SAW THE LORD ALWAYS IN MY PRESENCE ; FOR HE IS AT MY RIGHT HAND, SO THAT I WILL NOT BE SHAKEN. 26 'THEREFORE MY HEART WAS GLAD AND MY TONGUE EXULTED ; MOREOVER MY FLESH ALSO WILL LIVE IN HOPE ; 27 BECAUSE YOU WILL NOT ABANDON MY SOUL TO HADES, NOR ALLOW YOUR HOLY ONE TO UNDERGO DECAY. 28 'YOU HAVE MADE KNOWN TO ME THE WAYS OF LIFE ; YOU WILL MAKE ME FULL OF GLADNESS WITH YOUR PRESENCE.' 29 "Brethren , I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 "And so, because he was a prophet and knew that GOD HAD SWORN TO HIM WITH AN OATH TO SEAT one OF HIS DESCENDANTS ON HIS THRONE, 31 he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that HE WAS NEITHER ABANDONED TO HADES, NOR DID His flesh SUFFER DECAY. 32 "This Jesus God raised up again, to which we are all witnesses. 33 "Therefore having been exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has poured forth this which you both see and hear. 34 "For it was not David who ascended into heaven, but he himself says : 'THE LORD SAID TO MY LORD, "SIT AT MY RIGHT HAND, 35 UNTIL I MAKE YOUR ENEMIES A FOOTSTOOL FOR YOUR FEET."' 36 "Therefore let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord and Christ -this Jesus whom you crucified." (Acts 2:22-36)

11 While he was clinging to Peter and John, all the people ran together to them at the so-called portico of Solomon, full of amazement. 12 But when Peter saw this, he replied to the people, "Men of Israel, why are you amazed at this, or why do you gaze at us, as if by our own power or piety we had made him walk ? 13 "The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified His servant Jesus, the one whom you delivered and disowned in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release Him. 14 "But you disowned the Holy and Righteous One and asked for a murderer to be granted to you, 15 but put to death the Prince of life, the one whom God raised from the dead, a fact to which we are witnesses. 16 "And on the basis of faith in His name, it is the name of Jesus which has strengthened this man whom you see and know ; and the faith which comes through Him has given him this perfect health in the presence of you all. 17 "And now, brethren, I know that you acted in ignorance, just as your rulers did also. 18 "But the things which God announced beforehand by the mouth of all the prophets, that His Christ would suffer, He has thus fulfilled. 19 "Therefore repent and return, so that your sins may be wiped away, in order that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord ; 20 and that He may send Jesus, the Christ appointed for you, 21 whom heaven must receive until the period of restoration of all things about which God spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from ancient time. 22 "Moses said, 'THE LORD GOD WILL RAISE UP FOR YOU A PROPHET LIKE ME FROM YOUR BRETHREN ; TO HIM YOU SHALL GIVE HEED to everything He says to you. 23 'And it will be that every soul that does not heed that prophet shall be utterly destroyed from among the people.' 24 "And likewise, all the prophets who have spoken, from Samuel and his successors onward, also announced these days. 25 "It is you who are the sons of the prophets and of the covenant which God made with your fathers, saying to Abraham, 'AND IN YOUR SEED ALL THE FAMILIES OF THE EARTH SHALL BE BLESSED.' 26 "For you first, God raised up His Servant and sent Him to bless you by turning every one of you from your wicked ways (Acts 3:11-26).

Fred A. Malone writes, “Dear preacher, is this how you preach Christ in all the Scriptures? Is this your controlling principle as you study each text? Is this how you preach “the whole counsel of God”? If it is not, you may be guilty of hiding Christ from your hearers. Instead, consider the whole message of the Bible as you preach each text. Let Scripture interpret Scripture!
Christ-centered preaching is mandated biblically and theologically in the Bible. We must be men saturated with Scripture and saturated with Christ revealed in Scripture so that we can set Him before the lost and found ears of our hearers".

As an old Anglican, Bishop Reynolds, exhorted preachers:
Preach Christ Jesus the Lord. Determine to know nothing among your people, but Christ crucified. Let his name and grace, his spirit and love, triumph in the midst of all your sermons. Let your great end be to glorify him in the heart, to render him amiable and precious in the eyes of his people, to lead them to him, as a sanctuary to protect them, a propitiation to reconcile them, a treasure to enrich them, a physician to heal them, an advocate to present them and their services to God, as wisdom to counsel them, as righteousness to justify, as sanctification to renew, as redemption to save. Let Christ be the diamond to shine in the bosom of all your sermons"(1).


Principle number Two:
It was authoritative preaching 

 And there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12)


17 "But so that it will not spread any further among the people, let us warn them to speak no longer to any man in this name." 18 And when they had summoned them, they commanded them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus (Acts 4:17-18).

What does, "in the name of Jesus" mean?

One writer puts defines it this way,  "If a wealthy man hires me and gives me a power of attorney to purchase real estate, and if I act within that authorization, I could purchase a shopping mall in his name. I would receive no benefit from that transaction, except for his gratitude and the salary he chooses to pay me. If I tried to buy a shopping center on my own, they’d laugh me out of the bank. But if I go in his name, they would do business with me.
If you appoint someone to act in your name, it means that they can act as your agent within the restrictions you impose. Jesus has empowered His followers to act in His name to do certain specified deeds: feed the hungry, clothe the naked, preach the gospel, and so on.
If you do something in Jesus’ name it means that you do it with the authority He gave you and not on your own authority, and that you act within the limits of your authorization, whatever those limits may be. You act as His agent, in His stead, to His credit and for His benefit. You have no benefit from your deeds except His thanks and whatever reward He chooses to  give you"(2).

 The powerful preaching seen throughout the books of Acts was done by men who understood that they were not preaching under their own authority, but under the authority of Christ, meaning they weren't preaching themselves or their own ideas. They were under orders to Christ and accountable for His message.


Shawn Chancellor writes,"preaching that is authoritative appeals to Divine authority rather than stories and illustrations.  In many pulpits, preaching has become storytelling.  Stories are crafted to tug at the heart strings, fan the emotions and generate a shallow short lived burst of zeal.  However, such an approach fails to appreciate a simple fact; emotionalism is a self-centered reaction and can never produce true service to anyone other than self.  Certainly illustrations are useful in preaching, the Lord Himself employed them often, however illustrations prove nothing.  At the close of the Sermon on the Mount the audience responded in surprise to the greatest preacher who ever spoke, not because of His great stories but because of the authority with which He spoke.  For preaching to be powerful it must appeal to the Word and demonstrate the truth of the message by Divine authority"(3)

One other thought about authoritative preaching.  If you read the OT you will NEVER, EVER  find a prophet of God saying, "In my opinion, God is saying" or "What I feel or think God is saying is......"  No, the OT prophet ALWAYS prefaced his preaching with "Thus saith the Lord".




Principle Number Three:
It was Holy Spirit empowered preaching

"...but you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be My witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and even to the remotest part of the earth." (Acts 1:8)

 And when they had prayed, the place where they had gathered together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak the word of God with boldness (Acts 4:31)

 "But they were unable to cope with the wisdom and the Spirit with which he was speaking" (Acts 6:10).

Pastor John MacArthur emphasizes the preacher’s complete reliance upon the Holy Spirit. “Powerful preaching occurs,” he writes, “only when a Spirit-illumined man of God expounds clearly and compellingly God’s Spirit-inspired revelation in Scripture to a Spirit-illumined congregation.” The Holy Spirit, who inspired the biblical text, is the same Spirit who must enlighten the preacher and the congregation.  MacArthur clarifies: “Illumination is the work of the Holy Spirit that opens one’s spiritual eyes to comprehend the meaning of the Word of God. It involves the preacher of Scripture and his audience. God’s objective and historically past revelation in Scripture cannot be understood accurately apart from the present, personal, and subjective work of the Holy Spirit.” Without the Spirit teaching both the preacher and the listener, the Bible remains something of a closed book. Without His empowerment, the preacher will resort to manipulative techniques and fleshly coercions with the listener.  In preaching, MacArthur affirms that the preacher must not depend upon mere rhetoric, but upon the Holy Spirit: “Regardless of the erudition, the compelling logic, the soaring rhetoric, or the clever and interesting communication style, if the truth spoken is not accompanied by the power of God, it accomplishes nothing. But when empowered by God as it enters the prepared soul, the gospel truth saves.” To this end, MacArthur stresses that the Spirit must be at work, or preaching is vain:  “Genuine soul-transforming power accompanying gospel preaching is the work of the Spirit energizing both the preacher and the hearer.” The preacher can deliver the truth to the listener’s ear, but the Holy Spirit must take it to the mind and heart.  Aware of his vulnerability, MacArthur states: “I just pray that my own church would be a place of powerful preaching, and that we would never substitute anything for the Spirit-energized preaching of Christ, His cross, and the Word of God.” No amount of truth, if delivered without the Spirit’s ministry, can impact those who hear it (4).
     


      Principle Number Four:  
     It was prayer based  preaching

 "And now, Lord, take note of their threats, and grant that Your bond-servants may speak Your word with all confidencewhile You extend Your hand to heal, and signs and wonders take place through the name of Your holy servant Jesus." 31 And when they had prayed, the place where they had gathered together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak the word of God with boldness (Acts 4:29-31).  

 "But we will devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word
(Acts 6:4).
 

“Praying gives sense, brings wisdom, and broadens and strengthens the mind. The prayer closet is a perfect schoolteacher and schoolhouse for the preacher. Thought is not only brightened and clarified in prayer, but thought is born in prayer” (E.M. Bounds).

One writers writes the following, "The most important preparation is the preparation of the preacher. That has to happen in relationship with God, and prayer is an important part of that love relationship. By prayer, we invite the Holy Spirit to touch our hearts and lives, to impress us with the truths of a passage. The sermon needs to be born of prayer and bathed in prayer. The Holy Spirit knows the needs of my listeners, and He will reveal to me the things that they need to hear. Then when we deliver the sermon, the Holy Spirit comes in response to our prayerful invitation and anoints us with power and freedom.

Bounds puts it this way, “Prayer, in the preacher’s life, in the preacher’s study, in the preacher’s pulpit, must be a conspicuous and an all-impregnating force and an all coloring ingredient.” He continues, “The text, the sermon, should be the result of prayer. The study should be bathed in prayer, all its duties impregnated with prayer, its whole spirit the spirit of prayer”(5).



Principle Number Five:
It was Signs and Wonders accompanied  preaching 

29 "And now, Lord, take note of their threats, and grant that Your bond-servants may speak Your word with all confidence, 30 while You extend Your hand to heal, and signs and wonders take place through the name of Your holy servant Jesus." 31 And when they had prayed, the place where they had gathered together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak the word of God with boldness.  32 And the congregation of those who believed were of one heart and soul ; and not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were common property to them. 33 And with great power the apostles were giving testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and abundant grace was upon them all (Acts 5:29-33)
  
John Piper another favorite preacher next to John MacArthur has some interesting thoughts on the place of signs and wonders in the 21st century church.  Why Do Signs and Wonders Not Compromise Preaching?  The answer to the question—why signs and wonders do not have to compromise the power of preaching the gospel—goes like this: Acts 14:3 says that Paul and Barnabas "remained a long time [in Iconium] speaking boldly for the Lord, who bore witness to the word of his grace, granting signs and wonders to be done by their hands." This is utterly crucial: Signs and wonders are God's witness to his Word. They are not in competition with the Word. They are not against the Word. They are not over the Word. They are divine witnesses to the value and truth and necessity and centrality of the Word.   Here is the way I would sum up the relationship between the gospel and signs and wonders: signs and wonders are not the saving Word of grace; they are God's secondary testimony to the Word of his grace. Signs and wonders do not save. They are not the power of God unto salvation. They do not transform the heart—any more than music or art or drama or magic shows. What changes the heart and saves the soul is the self-authenticating glory of Christ seen in the message of the gospel (2 Corinthians 3:18–4:6). But even if signs and wonders can't save the soul, they can, if God pleases, shatter the shell of disinterest; they can shatter the shell of cynicism; they can shatter the shell of false religion. Like every other good witness to the Word of grace, they can help the fallen heart to fix its gaze on the gospel where the soul-saving, self-authenticating glory of the Lord shines....“What is needed is some mighty demonstration of the power of God, some enactment of the Almighty, that will compel people to pay attention, and to look, and to listen . . . That is why I am urging you to pray for this. When God acts, he can do more in a minute than man with his organizing can do in fifty years. (Revival, pp. 121–122) [6]. May I add this as a disclaimer.  I appreciate John's perspective, but I don't share it.  I'm not Charismatic and therefore do not believe that the miraculous gifts (i.e., healings, tongues and prophecy) further serve a New Testament purpose. At that time in the church's history the Gospel needed supernatural authentication and so did it's messengers. Since that foundation has been laid, Signs and wonders are no longer necessary to authenticate or affirm God's message. It is the lifestyles of believers that add credibility to the preaching of the Gospel.  In today's dispensation truly powerful preaching is accompanied by truly transformed lives. I sincerely believe that a Gospel transformed life although unable to save a soul can indeed, "shatter the shell of cynicism, shatter the shell of false religion and can help the fallen heart to fix its gaze on the Gospel where the soul-saving, self-authenticating glory of the Lord shines...."


Principle Number Six:
It was Scripture saturated preaching

14 But Peter, taking his stand with the eleven, raised his voice and declared to them: "Men of Judea and all you who live in Jerusalem, let this be known to you and give heed to my words. 15 "For these men are not drunk, as you suppose, for it is only the third hour of the day ; 16 but this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel : 17 'AND IT SHALL BE IN THE LAST DAYS,' God says, 'THAT I WILL POUR FORTH OF MY SPIRIT ON ALL MANKIND ; AND YOUR SONS AND YOUR DAUGHTERS SHALL PROPHESY, AND YOUR YOUNG MEN SHALL SEE VISIONS, AND YOUR OLD MEN SHALL DREAM DREAMS ; 18 EVEN ON MY BONDSLAVES, BOTH MEN AND WOMEN, I WILL IN THOSE DAYS POUR FORTH OF MY SPIRIT And they shall prophesy. 19 'AND I WILL GRANT WONDERS IN THE SKY ABOVE AND SIGNS ON THE EARTH BELOW, BLOOD, AND FIRE, AND VAPOR OF SMOKE. 20 'THE SUN WILL BE TURNED INTO DARKNESS AND THE MOON INTO BLOOD, BEFORE THE GREAT AND GLORIOUS DAY OF THE LORD SHALL COME. 21 'AND IT SHALL BE THAT EVERYONE WHO CALLS ON THE NAME OF THE LORD WILL BE SAVED.'
……"For David says of Him, 'I SAW THE LORD ALWAYS IN MY PRESENCE ; FOR HE IS AT MY RIGHT HAND, SO THAT I WILL NOT BE SHAKEN. 26 'THEREFORE MY HEART WAS GLAD AND MY TONGUE EXULTED ; MOREOVER MY FLESH ALSO WILL LIVE IN HOPE ; 27 BECAUSE YOU WILL NOT ABANDON MY SOUL TO HADES, NOR ALLOW YOUR HOLY ONE TO UNDERGO DECAY. 28 'YOU HAVE MADE KNOWN TO ME THE WAYS OF LIFE ; YOU WILL MAKE ME FULL OF GLADNESS WITH YOUR PRESENCE.' 29 "Brethren , I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 "And so, because he was a prophet and knew that GOD HAD SWORN TO HIM WITH AN OATH TO SEAT one OF HIS DESCENDANTS ON HIS THRONE, 31 he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that HE WAS NEITHER ABANDONED TO HADES, NOR DID His flesh SUFFER DECAY. 32 "This Jesus God raised up again, to which we are all witnesses. 33 "Therefore having been exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has poured forth this which you both see and hear. 34 "For it was not David who ascended into heaven, but he himself says : 'THE LORD SAID TO MY LORD, "SIT AT MY RIGHT HAND, 35 UNTIL I MAKE YOUR ENEMIES A FOOTSTOOL FOR YOUR FEET (Acts 2:17-21,25-35).

19 "Therefore repent and return, so that your sins may be wiped away, in order that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord ; 20 and that He may send Jesus, the Christ appointed for you, 21 whom heaven must receive until the period of restoration of all things about which God spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from ancient time. 22 "Moses said, 'THE LORD GOD WILL RAISE UP FOR YOU A PROPHET LIKE ME FROM YOUR BRETHREN ; TO HIM YOU SHALL GIVE HEED to everything He says to you. 23 'And it will be that every soul that does not heed that prophet shall be utterly destroyed from among the people.' 24 "And likewise, all the prophets who have spoken, from Samuel and his successors onward, also announced these days. 25 "It is you who are the sons of the prophets and of the covenant which God made with your fathers, saying to Abraham, 'AND IN YOUR SEED ALL THE FAMILIES OF THE EARTH SHALL BE BLESSED (Acts 3:19-25).

The Apostle Peter in these two recorded sermons references from all three types of Old Testament literature: The Law, Prophets and Psalms.  He was a diligent student of Scripture and it reflected in his preaching.  The great American revivalist Jonathan Edwards held the firm conviction that good preaching is saturated with Scripture.  “Every sermon must steadily, constantly and frequently quote the Word of God. This truth will ensure that we stay on track as faithful ministers of the Word”(7).


Principle Number Seven:
It was sovereignty oriented preaching

"this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death" (Acts 2:23).

“For truly in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever Your hand and Your purpose predestined to occur" (Acts 4:27-28).

“So in the present case, I say to you, stay away from these men and let them alone, for if this plan or action is of men, it will be overthrown; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them; or else you may even be found fighting against God" (Acts 5:38-39).

Understanding God's sovereignty in our preaching takes the weight off us and puts it on God, where it belongs.  It's not about gimmick, creativity or personality, relevance, technique, methodology or homiletic skill that makes our preaching effectual, it's dependence on the knowledge that God WILL accomplish His purpose, He will achieve His desired results through His word rightly divided and clearly preached.

Roger Ellsworth writes, "God is to be the focus of our preaching. We are to preach the sovereign God who sovereignly gave His Word and sovereignly saves through that Word. The fact is that God is the hero of every Bible passage, But, what strange days these are! God is conspicuously absent from much of our preaching. Jesus feeding the 5000 has become more about the little boy than about the Lord. David slaying Goliath has become how to kill the giants in your life. Bishop John R. Moore has rightly said: "We've humanized God, deified man, and minimized sin."

If we truly understand and appreciate the sovereignty of God, we will preach…

  • the Bible as the Word of the sovereign God.
  • man as the creation of the sovereign God.
  • sin as rebellion against the sovereign God.
  • eternal destruction as the just judgment of the sovereign God.
  • the incarnation as the sovereign God taking our humanity.
  • the life of Christ as the sovereign God providing the perfect righteousness that He Himself demands.
  • the cross as the atonement of the sovereign God.
  • the resurrection as the sovereign God declaring His satisfaction with Christ.
  • faith as the gift of the sovereign God.
  • sanctification as the ongoing, sure work of the sovereign God.
  • heaven as the victory of the sovereign God (8). 

                                                        Principle Number Eight:
                              It was bold and courageous preaching

"When they had brought them, they stood them before the Council. The high priest questioned them, saying, “We gave you strict orders not to continue teaching in this name, and yet, you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and intend to bring this man’s blood upon us.”But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men.......They took his advice; and after calling the apostles in, they flogged them and ordered them not to speak in the name of Jesus, and then released them.So they went on their way from the presence of the Council, rejoicing that they had been considered worthy to suffer shame for His name. And every day, in the temple and from house to house, they kept right on teaching and preaching Jesus as the Christ.  (Acts 5:27-29, 40-42)

David Dewan writes, "Courageous preaching has never been popular. Declaring the truth of the Scriptures has never "won friends and influenced people." John R. W. Stott said in his classic book on preaching, Between Two Worlds, that we are called to the sacred task of biblical exposition and commissioned to proclaim what God has said, not what human beings want to hear. Many modern churchmen suffer from a malady called "itching ears," which induces them to accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings (2 Tim 4:3). "But we have no liberty to scratch their itch or pander to their likings," according to Stott.
The Bible is full of men who did not "pander" to what people wanted to hear. There were many "lone voices" that spoke with power and authority. We can also look in church history at men and women who spoke with great courage to a dark and sinful world The Word of God is our only source of inspiration, which is as it should be (9).
  
During the Italian campaign, Zwingli saw 6,000 Swiss youth die, in the service of the Pope, at Marignon. He returned home convinced that “selling blood for gold” was not only a waste of young manhood through senseless violence, but also it was corrupting the men’s souls through avarice, pride and greed. He observed that the entire country was deteriorating spiritually and morally under the lure of gold from foreign princes. Zwingli spoke out boldly: “The situation is very serious, we are already contaminated. Religion is in danger of ceasing amongst us. We despise God…” Zwingli’s outspoken preaching against this lucrative profession cost him his pulpit in Glarus.  Forced out of Glarus, he was able to secure a pastoral position at Einsiedeln - where he continued to preach against mercenary service (10).



                                                    Principle Number Nine:                                  
                                                     It was confident preaching

"Now as they observed the confidence of Peter and John and understood that they were uneducated and untrained men, they were amazed, and began to recognize them as having been with Jesus" (Acts 4:13). 

It goes without saying that powerful preaching is confident preaching.  The Greek word for confidence here is the word "parresia" and means, "freedom in speaking".  These first century preachers weren't cocky or arrogant, in other words they weren't confident in their own ability or credentials. The text states that these men were uneducated and untrained meaning they didn't have the benefit of formal theological education, therefore their confidence (i.e., freedom to speak) could only be credited to the fact that they had been with Jesus.  The commentator Barnes writes the following:  "They gave evidence that they had seen him, been with him, heard him, and were convinced that he was the Messiah. We may learn here:

(1) That if men wish to be successful in preaching, it must be based on deep and thorough conviction of the truth of what they deliver.

(2) they who preach should give evidence that they are acquainted with the Lord Jesus Christ; that they have imbibed his spirit, pondered his instructions, studied the evidences of his divine mission, and are thoroughly convinced that he was from God.

(3) boldness and success in the ministry, as well as in everything else, will depend far more on honest, genuine, thorough conviction of the truth than on the endowments of talent and learning, and the arts and skill of eloquence. No man should attempt to preach without such a thorough conviction of truth; and no man who has it will preach in vain.

(4) God often employs the ignorant and unlearned to confound the wise, 1 Corinthians 1:27-28. But it is not by their ignorance. It was not the ignorance of Peter and John that convinced the Sanhedrin. It was done in spite of their ignorance. It was their boldness and their honest conviction of truth. Besides, though not learned in the schools of the Jews, they had been under a far more important training, under the personal direction of Christ himself, for three years; I and now they were directly endowed by the Holy Spirit with the power of speaking with tongues. Though not taught in the schools, yet there was an important sense in which they were not unlearned and ignorant men. Their example should not, therefore, be held in favor of an unlearned ministry. Christ himself expressed his opposition to an unlearned ministry by teaching them himself, and then by bestowing on them miraculous endowments which no learning at present can furnish. It may be remarked, further, that in the single selection which he made of an apostle after his ascension to heaven, when he came to choose one who had not been under his personal teaching, he chose a learned man, the apostle Paul, and thus evinced his purpose that there should be training or education in those who are invested with the sacred office (11).

                                   Principle Number Ten:
                           It was conscience pricking preaching

Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him  in your midst, just as you yourselves know—this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death (Acts 2:22-23).

Therefore let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord and Christ—this Jesus whom you crucified (Acts 2:36).

The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified His servant Jesus, the one whom you delivered and disowned in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release Him.“But you disowned the Holy and Righteous One and asked for a murderer to be granted to you (Acts 3:13-14).

if we are on trial today for a benefit done to a sick man, as to how this man has been made well, let it be known to all of you and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead—by this name this man stands here before you in good health (Acts 4:9-10).

The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom you had put to death by hanging Him on a cross.“He is the one whom God exalted to His right hand as a Prince and a Savior, to grant repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.“And we are witnesses of these things; and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey Him (Acts 5:30-33). 

Powerful preaching is NOT like a Shotgun, meaning "wide and general", rather powerful preaching is like a Lazer, "focused and direct". Powerful preaching is not afraid to point the appropriate finger like Nathan did to David and proclaim, "You are the man" (2 Sam 12:7).



The Late Great C.H. Spurgeon preached the following on the Lords day in 1889 concerning Peter's first sermon in Acts 2.  Pastor Spurgeon's words have great application to preachers today, "May it ever be the preacher's one desire to win men to repentance towards God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ! May no minister wish to be admired, but may he long that his Lord and Master may be sought after! May none bewilder their people with the clouds of theoretic philosophy, but refresh them with the rain of revealed truth? Oh, that we could so preach that our hearers should be at once pricked in their hearts, and so be led at once to believe in our Lord Jesus, and immediately to come forward and confess their faith in his name" (12).


                             Principle Number Eleven:
                                   It was persuasive preaching

And with many other words he solemnly testified and kept on exhorting them, saying, “Be saved from this perverse generation! (Acts 2:40).

Therefore repent and return, so that your sins may be wiped away, in order that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord (Acts 3:19).

Powerful preaching doesn't take "NO" for an answer.  Powerful preaching is not satisfied with JUST disseminating information, rather it seeks a decision. Larry Overstreet writes, "Vines and Shaddix are examples of modern homileticians who identify that the motive of biblical preaching is "to see people respond positively to God's Word," the "eliciting of behavioral change," and that "every sermon must be prepared and delivered with the intent of persuading people to say yes to the message" .
 
Shawn Chancellor writes, "persuasive preaching, is intended to call people to change.  This is not the idea of calling for new techniques, shallow thoughts that will never stir deep waters, but messages that reach deep into the hearts and call for true principled change.  Moses delivered such a message standing between Pharaoh and the Red Sea.  He did not call on the people to try a new method of running from an oppressor, he called on them to trust in God and follow Him without question.  He called on them to change their view of God and truly allow Him to be Lord in their lives.  Preaching loses its power when it is reduced to a self help mantra, a message that comes from the Holy Spirit is meant to stir the heart by way of the intellect.  When Preachers use the power of the Word to persuade the mind of the hearer they can reach the heart and the life of the hearer will be changed"(13).

In closing, for years I've heard about the desire to see real revival in America.  Both individuals and groups have prayed feverishly for God to pour out revival on this needy nation, yet revival has not come.  I believe the reason revival has NOT broken forth is NOT because God is not willing but because the conduit of revival is MIA.  I believe that conduit is preaching, not just any ole preaching, but the kind of powerful preaching spoken of in this article.  Much Preaching today is nothing more than aimless dialogue that could never spark real revival, the kind of revival experienced in the first Great Awakening.

Shawn Chancellor has hit the nail on the head, "Perhaps if we sought and practiced powerful preaching, preaching the way men of old preached today we could persuade people as they did, convert and convict people as they did.  Perhaps if we thought less of modern trends and more of scriptural examples we would see the power of preaching in our lives and churches today"(14).

For His Glory,

Todd


Footnotes:
1. Founder's Journal article, #65, summer 2006, by Fred A. Malone
2. From the web site of Ken Collins in an article entitled, "What does it mean to do thingss
in Jesus' name".
3.  From the blog of Shawn Chancellor, Faith and reason in the Modern world", Feb 2011.
4.  From the blog, Expository thoughts, an article, The role of he Holy Spirit and preaching, by Caleb Kolstad, Sept 27th, 2011.
5.  From the website, Ministry, international journal for Pastors, this article written by Derek Morris entitled, Prayer saturated preaching, July, 2009.
6.   A sermon by Pastor John Piper, entitled, How signs and wonders helped add multitudes to the Lord, (Acts 5:12-16).  Preached on Feb 17th, 1991. www.desiringGod.org.
7.  From the website, songtime.com.  This article written by Steve Cornell, entitled, Jonathan Edwards on the attributes of good preaching.
8.  An article written by Roger Ellsworth entitled, The sovereignty of God and pastoral ministry, winter 2003 (Founder's Journal).
9.  From an article written by David Dewan, entitled, Courageous preaching. Published in the online magazine, "The Arminian", a publication of the fundamental Wesleyan society, (vol 22, issue 1, Spring 2004). 
10.  From the website, "Christianhistorymagazine.org", entitled, "Zwingli: Father of teh Swiss reformation",(issue 4).
11.  From the Barnes commentary on Acts.
12.  A sermon by C.H. Spurgeon from Acts 2 in 1889, at Metropolitan Tabernacle, London.
13.  From the blog of Shawn Chancellor, Faith and reason in the Modern world", Feb 2011
14.  ibid.






Saturday, September 24, 2011

A tribute to Dr. John MacArthur - Todd McCauley


As I reflect on Dr. MacArthur's monumental accomplishment (having preached verse by verse through the ENTIRE New Testament) I'm both thrilled and saddened.  I'm thrilled because ALL of Dr. MacArthur's teaching, from the start to finish is available free of charge from the Grace to You website (GTY.org).  I remember years ago when you had to subscribe to the GTY Tape lending library in order to hear John's current stuff, but now it's free, 42 yrs worth (Feb 1969 - Jun 2011).

I'm also saddened because, this kind of dedicated, focused, expository ministry only comes along every blue moon.  When it comes to this kind of enduring, focused teaching ministry, there are many men who start well but end up mumbling about psychology or mysticism.  Example, at work I had a chance to talk to a recently retired pastor, some 40 plus yrs.  The best advice he had for me was to get involved in comptemplative prayer.  What!!!  After 40+ yrs of pastoral ministry, the best thing that you've experienced is contemplative prayer? 

My heart aches for Urban America.  I pray for UA, and I think and strategize often for UA.  The Kind of systematic, expository, verse by verse, book by book, teaching ministry that Dr. MacArthur has faithfully been engaged in over the last 42 yrs (since Feb, 1969) , in the same place (Grace Community Church, Calif) is something that doesn't happen much, if at all in UA.  I think UA to some degree would be a different place if we had men who committed to the same kind of long term, enduring, faithful expository teaching ministry in the same location. The hopeful news is just because I can't name one man of color who is on track to finish the entire NT Word by word, verse by verse, book by book, in his ministry lifetime, doesn't mean it's not happening.  I hope and pray that God will raise up a generation of Bible teaching pastors who's only goal is feed the flock the whole council of God and NOT just parts.  

Thank you Dr. John

Thursday, June 23, 2011

A review of Rob Bell's book, Love wins.

A few days ago, I finished the newest book by author/pastor Rob "skinny jeans" Bell, entitled, Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived . I’ve read several long, exhaustive reviews of his work.  I'm going to save you all a lot of time and intellectual energy.  My review of his book will be short and to the point.  Bell's book is junk.  This is the worst book that I have ever read in the history of books (I know I'm exaggerating).  Rob thinks that he’s helping us all by raising important questions on important eschatological issues, but in reality he is making a huge statement about the character and truth of God. “Hell is what we create for ourselves when we reject God’s love. Really! Hell is both a present reality for those who resist God and a future reality for those who die unready for God’s love. Really! Hell is what we make of heaven when we cannot accept the good news of God’s forgiveness and mercy. Really! ……hell is not forever, God will have his way. How can his good purposes fail? Really Rob! Every sinner will turn to God and realize he has already been reconciled to God, in this life or in the next. Really Rob!! There will be no eternal conscious torment. Really Rob!!! God says no to injustice in the age to come, but he does not pour out wrath (we bring the temporary suffering upon ourselves), and he certainly does not punish for eternity. In the end, love wins”. REALLY!!! (This whole quote borrowed from Kevin Deyoung but the “Really" and "Really Rob” interjections are all mine).
     I understand that some will argue that Rob's total body of work including his preaching ministry is really good, solid and beneficial. I have not read Rob's total body of worknor have I listened to many of his sermons, so that I don't know. Besides I'm not criticizing Rob's total body of work, just this one that currently stands before us.  My personal recommendation is to take this book to the nearest good will or thrift store bookstore and have them burn it.  It’s that bad!

For His Glory,
Todd

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Evangelism Encounter: Dan - Todd McCauley

  

A little after 4am yesterday morning, I was approached by a gentleman inquiring whether or not he would be allowed to sit outside one of our businesses and play his harmonica for passerby’s donations.  I told him that it was, “against our policy to allow solicitors”.  He responded by telling me that “technically” he was not a solicitor rather he was an entertainer.  I told him that if he wanted to “entertain” on this property, he would have to contact the property management company and get their permission.  He appeared to be okay with that disappointing news; you know people HATE to be told, “No”.  Anyway, I thought that would be the end of our conversation, but he wanted to continue talking.  I discovered that this fellow’s name was Dan.  He was semi-homeless, 39 years old about to turn 40 this weekend.  Dan it seems had experienced some, “bad luck” over the last year.  He lost several jobs over the last several months; the place where he was staying suffered some physical damage which the landlord refused to fix, so he ended up leaving.  He currently bunks with a so-called friend who steals his food and cigarettes.  He lives on unemployment benefits, about $76.00 dollars a week.  The car he owns is in need of repair and updated registration.  He also told me that His mom went crazy and his step father hates him.  Like the song writer wrote, “If it weren’t for bad luck, he’d have no luck at all”.  After having listened to his story, the Spirit of God directed me to turn the conversation in a spiritual direction.  I said to Dan, “Dan, can I ask you one of the most important questions of your life?”  He responds, “sure”.   I asked, “If you were to die today, where would you go?”  He then proceeds to tell me about an out of the body experience he had several years ago after having downed several pills and a pint of scotch.  His conclusion after that experience was that because his spirit was going up, he thought that he would probably go to Heaven.  I then asked him, “Dan, do you believe that there exists a divine being greater than man”?  He quickly responded, “oh, absolutely, there must be some designer or designers behind all that we see’.  I agreed and said, “Yes, this creation is too intricate to have simply come into existence by mere chance”.  I then asked, “Dan as you consider this creation, how would you describe this designer?”  Wouldn’t you agree that this designer is powerful? ‘Yes’, he said.  Dan wouldn’t you agree that this designer is intelligent?”  ‘Yes’, he replied.  Finally I stated, ‘Dan wouldn’t you also agree that this designer is moral?  On this point he hesitated, ‘Ah, I’m not sure about moral.  I decided to pursue this point further.  I said, “Dan, the reason I stated that the designer is moral is because of what’s in man”.  Dan, you would agree that mankind is also a product of this designer, correct?” He agreed.  Therefore, I said, "you would have to agree that the designer, designed man with what we call, ‘conscience’.  Conscience is our moral compass, our innate discerner of what’s right and wrong.  So if the designer designed us with a moral compass, He therefore must be moral himself, right? He hesitantly conceded, “O.k. and your point is”?  Dan, my point is this, because the designer is as we agreed, powerful, intelligent and moral, this means that we are ultimately responsible and accountable to Him”.  I then asked Dan the second most important question of his life, “Dan if you were to die today and you stood before this powerful, intelligent, moral designer would he find you a good person or a rebel”?  He quickly responded, “Oh, he would find me a good person”.  I asked, “would you mind taking the good person test to see if in fact you are a good person?”  He said, “sure”.  I told him that this test was based on the 10 commandments. “Dan”, I asked, “have you ever stolen anything ever in your life”?  He said, “yes”.  Again I asked, “Dan, have you ever told a lie?”  “Sure I have, came his swift reply.  Thirdly, I asked, “Dan have you ever wanted anything that belonged to another person?”  “Yes”, he replied.  Dan by your own admission, you’re a lying, thieving, coveter”.  He said, “Whoa! Wait a minute! That means that everyone on the planet is guilty”.  I said, “Dan, you got it!”  I continued, “Because every person on the planet is guilty this also means that every person on the planet including yourself will suffer the consequences of his/her guilt namely death and judgment”.    I said, “Dan, that’s the bad news.  The good news is that the designer whom the Bible calls God has provided a solution for man’s horribly corrupt condition.  That solution is none other than His son, The Lord Jesus Christ”.  I then proceeded to communicate to Dan the work of Christ through His life, death and subsequent resurrection.  I concluded my discussion with Dan by telling him that the only way Christ’s work would benefit him was for him to personally appropriate what Christ did.  The only way that he could do this was through what the Bible calls, “Repentance” and “Faith”.  This simply means, turning from your rebellion against God with your total self and then placing your total trust in what Christ accomplished on the cross.  We then parted ways and he said that he may come and see me tomorrow.
     Please pray for Dan as he considers his only option for redemption and the hope of glory.  Pray that the Lord of Glory would call Dan to Himself.

For His Glory,
Rev. Todd

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

America's most dangerous cities: A prayer project

These are America's 10 Most Dangerous Cities: Men and women of God, let's Bring these cities before the throne of Grace and ask God to dispatch His laboreres into these needy harvests. Maybe, just maybe he may call us to go. "Here am I Lord send me".

1. Flint, Mich.
Population: 109,245  Violent Crime Per 1,000: 22   2010 Murders: 53   Median Income: $27,049 (46.1% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 11.8% (2.8% above national average) The number of violent crimes committed in Flint increased for all categories considered for this list between 2009 and 2010. Perhaps most notably, the number of murders in the city increased from 36 to 53. This moves the city from having the seventh highest rate of homicide to the second highest. The number of aggravated assaults increased from 1,529 to 1,579, a rate of 14.6 assaults per 1,000 residents, placing the city in the No. 1 rank for rate of assaults. Flint police chief Alvern Lock stated late last year that he believed the city's violence stemmed from drugs and gangs. Flint has a relatively small median income of about $27,000 per household. The city also has a poverty rate of 36.2%.
2. Detroit
Population: 899,447  Violent Crime Per 1,000: 18.9  2010 Murders: 310  Median Income: $26,098 (48% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 12.7% (3.7% above national average)  The city crippled the most in America's post-industrial era is almost certainly Detroit. The Motor City has suffered from high rates of unemployment, homelessness, and crime. The city has one of the ten highest rates for three of the four types of violent crime identified by the FBI. Detroit has the sixth highest murder rate, the fifth highest robbery rate, and the second highest rate of aggravated assault. In 2005, a major reorganization of the city's police department took place after a federal investigation identified inefficiencies within the system. According to an article in The United Press, opponents of Detroit Mayor David Bing called for further intervention by the Justice Department in several shootings that occurred last year.
3. St. Louis
Population: 355,151 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 17.5  2010 Murders: 144  Median Income: $34,801 (30.7% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 9.3% (0.3% above national average)  Violent crime in St. Louis fell dramatically between 2009 and 2010, and has decreased since 2007. Despite this, crime rates remain extremely high compared with other cities. In 2010, the city's murder rate and rate of aggravated assault were each the third worst in the country. With regards to both violent and nonviolent crime, St. Louis was rated the most dangerous city based on FBI data released six months ago. As of December 2010, the murder rate in St. Louis was 6.3 times that of the state of Missouri. The city's gunshot murder rate for residents between 10 to 19 years old is also the second highest in the country, behind only New Orleans, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
4. New Haven, Conn.
Population: 124,856 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 15.8 2010 Murders: 22  Median Income: $38,279 (23.8% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 9.6% (0.6% above national average)  New Haven has historically had the highest rate of violent crime on the east coast. The impoverished, crime-ridden parts of the city stand in stark contrast to affluent Fairfield county to the West, and elite Yale University, which is located within the city itself. The number of murders in the city doubled last year. New Haven has the eighth highest rate of robbery and the fourth highest rate of assault in the U.S. The New Haven Police Department is considering adding cameras at every intersection in one of the neighborhoods where shootings are the most common.
5. Memphis, Tenn.
Population: 673,650 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 15.4  2010 Murders: 89  Median Income: $34,203 (31.8% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 9.9% (0.9% above national average)  Memphis has high rates for all the violent crimes considered for 24/7 Wall St.'s rankings. It has the sixth highest rate in the country. Incidents of violent crime in the city dropped slightly less than 15% between 2009 and 2010 though. Memphis Mayor AC Wharton attributes this decrease to Operation Safe Community, a citywide plan developed in 2005. The plan consists of a number of strategies meant to increase crime prevention, through toughening punishments for criminals, and the effectiveness of the city's legal system, through changes such as expanding court programs so that they operate consistently and at full capacity.
6. Oakland, Calif.
Population: 409,723 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 15.3  2010 Murders: 90  Median Income: $51,473 (2.4% above national average) Unemployment Rate: 11% (2% above national average)  Oakland's violent crime dropped about 5.5% between 2009 and 2010, from about 6,800 to 6,260. The city nevertheless has the tenth-highest rate of rape, the ninth-highest murder rate, and the second highest robbery rate in the country. In 2010, there were 7.12 robberies for every 1,000 Oakland residents. According to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle, Mayor Jean Quan has attempted to combat break-ins and theft by creating programs to keep potential wrongdoers off the streets by starting late-night basketball programs. It it unclear if these policies have worked.
7. Little Rock, Ark.
Population: 192,922 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 15.2  2010 Murders: 25  Median Income: $38,992 (22.3% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 6.8% (2.2% below national average)  Little Rock has one of the highest rates of aggravated assault and forcible rape in the country. Since 2009, reported assaults has increased while reported forcible rapes have decreased. According to Lt. Terry Hastings of the Little Rock Police Department, quoted by local station FOX16, Little Rock was "down almost 12 percent across the board on crime" in 2010. This may be accurate for many crimes, and especially nonviolent crimes, however, according to FBI data, violent crime increased from 2009 to 2010.
8. Baltimore
Population: 639,929 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 14.6  2010 Murders: 223  Median Income: $38,772 (22.7% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 7.4% (1.6% below national average)  Baltimore had the eighth-highest rate of violent crime per capita in 2010 among cities with 100,000 or more residents, and the second-highest east of the Mississippi. The number of violent crimes has dropped slightly in the past year -- from 9,600 to 9,300 -- but the Maryland city has some of the worst rates of dangerous offenses in the country. This includes the tenth-worst aggravated assault rate -- and the fourth-worst murder rate in the country.
9. Rockford, Ill.
Population: 156,180 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 14.5  2010 Murders: 20  Median Income: $36,990 (26% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 13.3% (4.3% above national average)  Rockford has unusually high violent crime rates for a city of its size. Most notably, the city has the fourth highest rate of aggravated assault in the country, with 10.5 cases for every 1,000 citizens in 2010. During the same period, 20 murders occurred, almost double the number in 2000. Quoted by the Rockford Register Star in 2007, Winnebago County Sheriff Dick Meyers said that he believed the city's "location worked against [it,]" as Rockford receives traffic from the drug markets in Madison, Chicago, and Milwaukee, resulting in heightened rates of violence.
10. Stockton, Calif.
Population: 292,047 Violent Crime Per 1,000: 13.8  2010 Murders: 49  Median Income: $45,730 (8.9% below national average) Unemployment Rate: 18.4% (9.4% above national average)ifWith a jobless rate of 18.4%, up from 18.1% a year ago, Stockton, California has one of the worst unemployment problems in the country. The huge percentage of unemployed residents may have contributed to horrible crime rates in the city, which is located 40 miles east of Oakland and San Francisco. Stockton was rated one of the most miserable cities to live in the country by Forbes in March, 2010. Violent crime was one of the chief measurements for its ranking. Of the 267 cities with populations over 100,000, Stockton has the 27th highest number of murders per 1,000 people and the 12th most aggravated assaults per 1,000. Last year, recognizing the crime problems in the city, the state temporarily diverted hundreds of of California Highway Patrol officers to aid the city's overwhelmed police department.


by Douglas A. McIntyre, Michael B. Sauter and Charles B.
Stockdale, Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Evangelism Encounter: D.J.

    


 I work as a third shift security officer here in North Carolina, which is both good and bad. It's bad because I'm always tired, sleep is not my friend. But on the other hand It's good because I have a lot freedom on my shift.  One of the freedoms that I have is being able to converse and share the gospel with a variety of people. Tonight, I had the chance to talk with a young man named D.J. He's an African-American in his mid to late 20's. I've seen this dude around quite a bit. Tonight though was the opportunity that I've been waiting and praying for. As he sat alone in a booth at the local McDonalds, I approached him and asked, "D.J. can I ask you the most important question you'll ever be asked in life? Of course this caught his attention and curiosity, "Sure", he replied. I then asked, "D.J. if you died tonight, where would you spend eternity"? He gave the classic answer, "I think I'd go to heaven". I then asked him if I could ask a follow-up question. "Sure", was his reply. "Ok, you've died and you're standing before God and He asks you, "Why should I let you in to my heaven". I asked, "What would you say"?     This second question is what stumped him. He thought for a moment and started appealing to his personal goodness, "I'm not perfect, but I'm a good dude". "I've not crossed every "T" nor dotted every "I", but overall I think I'm good. That's when I proceeded to ask if he would take the, "good person test" to validate if in fact he is as good as he thinks. He said, "OK" I then told him that this test is based on the 10 commandments. I then asked, "Have you ever told a lie? He said, "Yes". I said, "what do you call a person who tells a lie"? "that's right! "A liar". I then asked, "have you ever stolen anything ever in life"? He responded, "Yes', I said, "What do you call someone who steals?, "that's right", "a thief". I finally asked, "Have you ever used God's name as a cuss word"? He said, "Of course", I said, "The Bible calls this kind of person a blasphemer".   I then told him, "D.J. by you own confession, you are a lying, thieving, blasphemer - No he didn't punch me - I said, "if you were to stand before God, on the basis of these commandments, would He find you innocent or guilty? He replied, "Guilty". I then said, 'therefore, would you go to heaven or hell"? He said, "Hell". "D.J. does that concern you? At this point, D.J. has become visibly uncomfortable and begins to argue with me. He say's, "I don't agree with your interpretation of the Bible". "I don't want to talk about this anymore". I said, "Before I go, I must tell you the good news". I then told him of the work of Christ on behalf of guilty, condemned sinners. "D.J., Jesus is man's only solution for his sin" Only through faith in Christ alone can you be rescued from the power and condemnation of your guilt and rebellion before a holy God" and receive new life. In fact the Bible clearly teaches, that if any man is in Christ, he is a new person, the old is gone and behold the new. I closed by saying, "D.J. you must put your total trust in Christ alone as your Savior and Lord" He was sitting on a bench inside the restaurant and I illustrated faith, by telling him, "Just like you have trusted this bench to hold you up, is the same way you are told to trust Jesus, you must put your whole weight on him". At this point i could tell he was ready for me to leave. So I told him, that I hope to see him again and if I could do anything to help him, to please let me know. and the encounter was over.
      Please pray for D.J. that God in his Sovereign grace would be pleased to save him by His mercy. Men every time God gives me the opportunity to share the faith(i.e. the gospel) I'm reminded afresh of why He left me and us on the earth.

For His Glory
Rev Todd

Saturday, May 21, 2011

A study in Jude (vss. 5-7)

        The consequences of    
               defecting

      
Let’s review; According to verse 3, Jude states that it was his sincere desire to write to his readers about the salvation that they commonly shared.  But something happened.  He states that instead of writing to them about our great salvation, he felt led of God to write to them, urging them to fight for the gospel.  One of the reasons why he felt led to write urging them to fight for the gospel is because the gospel was under attack by apostate, false teachers.   In verse four (4), Jude states that these apostate, false teachers were stealthily placed by Satan into the fellowship of believers.  Jude further described these Apostates as condemned, ungodly and deceptive.
    Now according to verse five (5) Jude declares that he is also writing to remind his fellow believers of something that they’ve already learned and should still be mindful of.   You know, we need to be reminded of things that we have learned in times past.  Why?  For two reasons:

1.  In the words of D.L. Moody, "We leak".
2.  James writes, that we believers are sometimes, "forgetful hearers" (1:25)
                                                                                                                                         
Let me tell you exactly what Jude is reminding his fellow believers of; it can be summed up as follows: "There are consequences for defecting from the gospel".

    Hear this loud and clear, Jude is NOT writing to believers about believers defecting from the gospel.  Listen! Let me make this crystal clear based on what the Bible teaches.  True believers in Christ NEVER need fear defecting from the gospel. To say it this more clearly, true believers CAN, NEVER defect from the gospel.  I guess you call this Eternal Security.  I’m fully convinced that a true believer in Christ can NEVER lose his/her salvation.  My belief is anchored in understanding the bible’s teaching on the sovereignty of God in our total Salvation.  If according to Scripture I had nothing to do with gaining my salvation, then it’s only reasonable to believe that I have nothing to do with losing my salvation.  Eternal security CANNOT be properly understood apart from an understanding of Sovereign Election, the two go hand in hand.  Listen! If you don’t affirm sovereign election, you cannot affirm eternal security.  If man is a free moral agent (which he is not) and can choose when he/she is saved, then he/she can choose when not to be saved as well.  Therefore, when you read all of the so-called warning passages in Scripture (e.g.  Hebrews 6).  You must understand that these passages are NOT addressing true believers (i.e. “possessing professors”) rather they are addressing “non- possessing professors”.  True believers don’t have to worry about defecting from the gospel because of the sovereign work of salvation.  True believers are secure in Christ, not because of anything that they’ve done, rather, they are secure in Christ because and ONLY because of what He’s done for and in them (cf. Jude 1; Rom 8:28-30; Phil 1:6).  Therefore, Jude is NOT writing to remind his fellow believers about the dangers of defecting from the gospel, rather he is writing to remind his fellow believers that all false teachers will suffer the consequences of their defection from the truth. While we are engaged in the daily struggle of fighting for the sanctity and clarity of the gospel both inside and outside the church from apostate false teachers, it’s encouraging to know that ultimately they will get what they deserve in the end and that’s what Jude encouragingly reminds his readers of.    
    In verses 5-7, Jude recalls for his readers three historic groups in order to illustrate and remind his readers that there are indeed consequences for defecting from the gospel:
A.  Historic group number one: Israel (vs. 5)
“Now I desire to remind you, though you know all things once for all that the Lord, after saving a people out of the land of Egypt, subsequently destroyed those who did not believe”. 
     Jude writes that, “the Lord” (i.e. the sovereign master of the universe) after physically rescuing (i.e. saving) a people out of the land of Egypt – this people is none other than Israel (Ex 12:33f; 1 Cor 10:5-10; Heb 3:16f). Subsequently destroyed (i.e. brought to ruin, loss of well-being; not extinction.  The Bible DOES NOT teach Annihilationism) those who did not believe
B.  Historic group number twoAngels (vs. 6)
“…And angels who did not keep their own domain, but abandoned their proper abode, He has kept in eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day…”
     Much can be learned about “Angels”.  In fact a whole segment of Systematic Theology is dedicated to the study of angels called, Angelology.  Therefore suffice it to say, Angels are God’s handiwork, created for His glory (cf. Ps 145:2, 5; Col 1:16-17). Jude states that some of the angelic host, “… did not keep their own domain…” This means that some of the angels did not hold fast or cling to their God assigned positions or sphere of influence (i.e. domain).  Interestingly the verb “keep” here in verse six is in the Active voice meaning that these particular angels acted of their own volition and chose to leave their assigned roles.  Angels do have free will.  Jude further states that these certain angels, “…abandoned their proper abode…” The word, “abandoned” here is a military term and speaks of one deserting an assigned post. The phrase, “proper abode” simply means here, “home” or “dwelling”.  Therefore, some of these angels exerted their wills and deserted not only their assigned roles, but their assigned heavenly dwelling.  Jude concludes his thoughts on angels by stating that those who abandoned both role and dwelling now face the consequences of their actions. He states that God keeps these disobedient angels in, “…eternal bonds under darkness for the judgment of the great day”.  Therefore at one moment in time past, God rounded up all the disobedient angels, imprisoned them in the neither regions where utter darkness is defined as that which one can feel (cf. 2 Pet 2:4,17).  God continues to keep these angels in bondage until they face ultimate judgment.
C.  Historic group number threeSodom and Gomorrah (vs. 7)
“…just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire
     Genesis 13 introduces us to the places of Sodom and Gomorrah (cf. vs. 10).  The reason I say, “places” is because they were two separate places evidenced by the fact that they were governed by two separate kings (cf. Gen 14:2, 8).  According to Gen 13; Abraham and his nephew Lot began to have some conflict over space (vs. 6).  Abraham provides a solution by having Lot choose wherever he wanted to settle (vs. 9).   Lot looks out over the vast land mass – the valley Jordan – likes what he sees and chooses it. It just so happens that two of the cities in the “valley” were Sodom and Gomorrah.  Verse 12 states that Lot moved his tents into Sodom.  You know it’s funny, we often pick places to live based on the property and not the people. That’s what happened to Lot; he saw the beauty of the suburbs and didn’t consider the depravity of the residents.  Verse13 states, “Now the men of Sodom were wicked exceedingly and sinners against the LORD.  The other cities around Sodom and Gomorrah included: Admah, Zeboiim and Zoar (Gen 14:8).  Jude writes that all these cities were corrupt and sinful and gave themselves to “…gross immorality and going after strange flesh….”  The Greek word for, “gross immorality” is the word from which we derive the English word pornography.  This word speaks of any kind of illicit sexual intercourse.  Now you know this right?  Any kind of sexual activity outside of the bonds of marriage is illicit. This lets me know that marriage was not high on the priority list in the, “valley”. The idea of strange flesh is really weird it’s a compound word which means, “Flesh of different kinds”.  What’s being said here is that their sexual expression was not just confined to humans.  As we know, Sodom and the surrounding cities were destroyed by God’s judgment of fire (cf. Gen 19:24f). 
     What’s interesting is that the three characteristics and consequences that describe these three historic groups are the same characteristics and consequences that are found in and will be experienced by all false teachers:
1. Israel was characterized by unbelief and was subsequently destroyed.  In the same way false teachers are characterized by unbelief will subsequently be destroyed by God.
2.  Angels were characterized by rebellion and were judged by God.  In the same way false teachers are characterized by rebellion and will be judged by God.
3.  Sodom and Gomorrah were characterized by immorality and perversity and were punished by God.  In the same way false teachers are characterized by immorality and perversity and will be punished by God in Hell.
     Remember!  Jude is NOT writing to warn his fellow believers about the dangers of defecting from the gospel - because true believers can’t defect. Rather he is writing to encourage his fellow believers that are engaged in the battle for the gospel that all false teachers who have crept into the church will one day be judged and will suffer the consequences of their defection from the truth of the gospel”.

For His Glory,
Todd